The Public Forum of The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to and/or
comment upon correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
Letters/Questions - Addressed on May
Note: If you believe that you are in our
Mailing List and are not
receiving any mailings, please let
us know and we will advise you
may be the problem and how to correct it. If you are not in our
Main Mailing List and wish to be added to it, do let
Country ID Withheld
on May 31st
I am writing on behalf of a friend whom I will call Leo.
Leo is taking a battery of government related tests in an effort to
secure a better position. For the first set of tests someone gave him
advantageous information before the test, thus, logically, he did
well. Afterwards, remorse set in and he underwent the Sacrament
For the second set of tests, the same individual gave him advantageous
information in a folded slip of paper. Leo, well repented of his prior
transgression, placed the note in his pocket and never read it.
Now, the last set of tests are coming up and Leo is concerned because
he feels that the "benefactor" will, this time, give him the
information verbally. In this case - even if he did not want to hear
it, he will.
Leo does not want to receive said advantageous information yet he does
not want to tell his "benefactor" to remain silent for fear of
offending him. In addition, it will create for himself a few
problems since the "benefactor" is a member of his family plus is
connected with him through his current employment.
What should he do?
A. The answer lies in the Holy Scriptures; most
specifically in 1 Corinthians 10:
23 All things are lawful for me, but all
things do not edify.
24 Let no man seek his own, but that which
25 Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, eat;
asking no question for conscience' sake.
26 The earth is the Lord's, and the fulness
27 If any of them that believe not, invite
you, and you will be
willing to go; eat of any thing that is set before you, asking no
question for conscience' sake.
28 But if any man say:
This has been sacrificed to idols, do not eat of it for his sake that
told it, and for conscience' sake.
29 Conscience, I say, not thy own, but the
other's. For why is my liberty judged by another man's conscience?
In plain English what Paul is saying is: If you eat food that was
offered to idols in the presence of a non believer in Christ, of one
who sacrifices to idols and then eats the food, you are causing
scandal; you give the impression that you are betraying your faith in
Christ. If conversely, the food was offered to idols before and is not presented to you as such,
it does not matter if you eat it - no scandal will be given; no soul
will be misled.
Even if Leo did not read the folded paper given to him for the second
set of tests, and if the "benefactor" knows Leo as a man of God, Leo
has already given a very poor example of Christianity. Even if Leo
could forget the verbal clues for the third set, once again, he will be
The only way out is to clear the air with the "benefactor" with great
charity - that is - do not make the "benefactor" look like a crook; let
God gently and progressively reveal his iniquity to him using your
gentle, but firm, example.
Let us not practice what the Vatican has been teaching for over 1600
years and because which the Evangelization failed - duplicity and
hypocrisy. Let us live the Gospel and, if the Church Administration
want to form a Conga Line and dance into hell, that is their
prerogative - we rather Soft Rock our way into Heaven.
From IC @
on May 28th
I have a question regarding the Divine
Encouragement postings, while I understand that no questions will be
entertained regarding it's source, I would just like to know whether
these messages are ongoing or if they are being, for want of a better
Please understand that I have no issue with it one way or the other
(after all, the Bible itself is "recycled", if you care to look at it
that way, and yet is always new) and that I greatly value these
messages, it's just that I remember this is the same message I read a
I also noticed that starting late February, you indicated that the
messages posted on this page would be replaced on a yearly basis, as
opposed to the previous notices that the messages would not be
re-posted anytime soon.
I know you all have a lot of work to
do, and seeing as my question is prompted by simple curiosity, please
feel free to ignore it if you feel that it is irrelevant.
Yours in Christ.
A. We notice that you call us "Friends" and not
"Family", which immediately brought to mind a certain biblical quote:
Regarding your central question, you have answered it yourself but we
will confirm it. You stated: I also noticed that
starting late February, you indicated that the messages posted on
this page would be replaced on a yearly basis.
That is the case,
although some alterations may be made in the actual Message of
Encouragement and/or miguel de Portugal Comments part of it as God
We certainly take no credit other than being His "gofer".
From WO @
on May 24th
Praised be Christ!
A question - in which I ask of what I perceive to be a potential collaboration, connivance, and coherence (of sorts) between some disparate elements (1). I refer directly to the "troublesome words" of Ratzinger both in reference to
Muslims, stirring up both fanatical Muslims - and Catholics.
Fanaticism, as you have shown, is not of God, (2) nor does it truly lead to Him. It can adversely affect any of us, if we are not diligent. It can occur, or be encouraged for malefic intent (3) by those who serve intelligent evil. In
consideration of the ingredients of the words of B XVI, "radical" Islam. Fatima Secret Scam (4), and the manipulation of Prophecy (3): could there be a link in all of these things? (3)
The oft repeated "prophecy" (actually a strange mix of several) is that of a "pope dying a death in exile", coupled with the purported words of the "third secret" in a vision of a "pope fleeing a city in ruins". When one considers
what has just happened, and the reaction of the Muslim "extremist" community, might B XVI be getting (or manufacturing) what could be a self fulfilling prophecy? And self induced. (5)
This stirs the pot in favor of the OWO (6) folks, potentially acting as a triggering mechanism for a whole slew of concurrent events. The finger flicking a domino, carefully calculated to trip over 100 others. Indeed we may be closer to Step 17 (7) then some may think!
Am I even "close" on my conjectures?
From Initials Withheld @
on May 22nd
Regarding my recent
e-mail which resulted in your latest document about the discernment of
the Will of God.
original draft email was long, with
many personal details. I decided you were to busy to bother with
I only posed the one question on discernment.
question you did answer...... and
went on and addressed just about all the points I had originally
did not send to you.
different circumstances, I too am doing with
my life what I never would have chosen to do of my own will (it started
stark moral choice, and led to everything else).
sagging lately, but several recent developments, including your reply,
re-confirmed to me that the Lord is with me in this.
God Bless you,
A. The above letter is a perfect example of what
we explained in the alluded document regarding how we
should be pliable to the prompting of
the Holy Spirit so that the
Will of God is manifested in whatever we do for the benefit of all!
May God be Eternally Praised for His Omnipotence and Mercy!
From KK @
on May 21st
Please help, I am asking God to restore
[name edited out] s' love for me in her
heart and mind so she has it again to give to me the same kind the
same amount that I have for her. Like when we WERE engaged only
Stronger and Everlasting.
God gave me faith and we are saved. This is
my hearts desire. This is really important to me. Can or will you
please help me in getting my miracle.
Maybe forward this request to
someone whom can please?
Thank you and God bless lots of love.
A. The cry of your heart has certainly pierced
Heaven, however, what we do not know if such relationship is in
accordance to the Will
Therefore, we ask the Eternal Father, in the Name of Jesus Christ, that
His Most Holy and Adorable Will be done regarding your and T's
relationship. If you are willing to accept His Will, then the result -
regardless - will be Perfect.
From RH @
on May 19th
Peace to all!
I am not trying to create fear but only concerned
that our life is so delicate and very dependent on God Almighty's will,
every second. Just this morning while going through the internet,
"Super Volcano" topic keeps hovering and bothering me that I need to
send you this mail and provide you the info.
Yes, there are
super volcanoes in Indonesia but did not know that there are other
areas with massive magma chambers: Hawaiian Islands, Iceland, and
Yellowstone. Yellowstone National Park, right here in North
These massive magma chambers could erupt anytime. Here's an excerpt
from an India Daily article:
is the possibility of a mega volcano now in the next ten years? The
answer lies in seismic activities of the earth. Underwater volcanoes,
earthquakes have progressively increased many folds in the last few
years. That can be a precursor to some very serious coming. Think about
this the three most sever earthquakes in last 150 years happened in the
last four months."
traditional geologists say: super volcanoes are likely to give decades
— even centuries — of warning signs before they erupt. The scientists
think those signs would include lots of earthquakes, massive
bulging of the land, an increase in small eruptions, 'swarms' of earthquakes in
changes in the chemical composition of lavas from smaller eruptions,
changes in gasses escaping the ground and, possibly, large-scale
cracking of the land."
A. The recent "flurry" of Super Volcano
talk lately has been because there has been a number of small, tell
tale 'swarms', earthquakes at just "the right places" that may point
out to such an event. We have addressed the Super Volcano issue
in the past. More details may be found through the following links:
As if earthquake
ravaged Indonesia doesn't have enough to worry about, now scientists
warn that a Sumatran super volcano might blow its top at any time. ..
 As the Yellowstone Super Volcano talk continues to
fill the e-waves we decided to take a look at the recent US earthquake
NEWS - Experiments near
Sumatra – are they trying to diffuse a super volcano repeat eruption
like the one 74000 years back. ...
We continue to pray for a
Green Apocalypse - an Apocalypse wherein the bulk of the Divine Justice
is dispensed through geo-astrological events (earthquakes, floods,
comets) as opposed to a massive nuclear holocaust.
From VR @
Dubai and India
on May 16th
I take exception to your argument in the Points to Ponder entry of
the 6th of May.
There are justifiable reasons why things happened as they did even
at the age of 12 in the life of the Lord. First of all, He was the
Lord, the Wisdom. That Wisdom was there on display for all to see
regardless of His age as Luke tells us. Only He didn't flaunt it. But
having gotten into a discussion with the teachers in the temple it was
His zeal for His Father's house which kept Him there, not His
disobedience to His earthly parents.
If anyone is to be taken to task for the mess up it would have to
be Joseph and Mary who having been told repeatedly by angels that this
was the Son of God, still And they understood not the saying which
he spake unto them. [Luke 2:50]
Perhaps they still could not
that God would be born and dwell in such a humble position and
dwellings such as theirs (Joseph's and Mary's). I know many people who
have the same problem when accepting the divinity of Jesus. If
information as you have written were to fall into their hands they
would be glad to accept it and justify their stand that the Bible
corrupted by Jews and Christians and thus, cannot be accepted
as scripture. I am talking about
Mohammad who leveled this charge
against the People of the Book as he called them. And his followers
continue to do so.
31 He that cometh from above, is above all.
He that is of the
earth, of the earth he is, and of the earth he speaketh. He that cometh
from heaven, is above all.
32 And what he hath seen and heard, that he
testifieth: and no man receiveth his testimony.
33 He that hath received his testimony, hath
set to his seal that God is true.
34 For he whom God hath sent, speaketh the
words of God: for God doth not give the Spirit by measure.
35 The Father loveth the Son: and he hath
given all things into his hand. 36 He that believeth in the Son, hath life
everlasting; but he
that believeth not the Son, shall not see life; but the wrath of God
abideth on him. [John 3]
Jesus' obedience was first to the Father not to
earthly parents. Similarly, many people 'disobey' their parents and
elders and convert to Christianity. I know of instances like these in
India where Hindus have been converted. Would that be a sin against
Let us decide which side we are on
and not simply level allegations against the copyists of the Bible.
19 Then Jesus answered, and said to them: Amen, amen,
I say unto
you, the Son cannot do any thing of himself, but what he seeth the
Father doing: for what things soever he doth, these the Son also doth
in like manner.
May God bless us all and may the Spirit
blow as He wills,
A. We quote the first sentence
of our statement in said Points to Ponder
dated May 6th:
ever wonder... why Jesus, who must have been as perfect a boy and son
as anyone could possibly imagine, stayed at the Temple of Jerusalem
[Luke 2: 41-50] chatting with the doctors of the Law - apparently
defying Mary and Joseph's authority?
qualifying word "apparently" clearly shows that
we are not stating that Jesus was defying Mary and Joseph's authority,
for that would be unthinkable, even of a preteen Jesus. Our point was
to highlight what the Church has been trying to do from its very early
day - strip Jesus and Mary of their Jewish roots. They, among so many
other things, have not understood that if Jesus is cut off from His
Jewish roots then He was not the Messiah, and that, He Was and Is!
At this point we must
paraphrase Jesus' words to Philip: "...Have I been so
long a time with you; and have you not known me? ... [John 14:9] and tell you: Yo
have been in our Very Select List, our Select List and Members List for
some time and yet you launch in the above tirade?
Your blatant anti-Semitism blinded you from what we have written in:
Foundation of Faith,
Biblical Literalism and its Dangers - Part
Part II, The
Jews Did Not Crucify
The Integration of Body
and Soul and Its Harmonious Functioning, and others.
We had noted some "fanatical hues" in your frequent past correspondence
(see posting of May 10th below as an example)
which we ascribed to a language usage problem, now we know that such is
not the case.
As you have noticed by now, you have been removed from all of our
Mailing Lists since Fanaticism
Is Not Part Of The Legacy Of Jesus Christ
We certainly do not recognize you to be in a position to tell us how to
modify the theological content of what we publish in the Name of God
while at the same time thank you for the news references which you have
shared with us in the past.
From G @
on May 13th
Good evening and God bless...
wondering your thoughts on Pat Robertson's so called "prophecy" for the
1st six months here in 2007 and the last 6 months. In the 1st six
says we will see such healings as we never have seen. In the last
months, September or beyond he states, a massive terrorist attack on
numerous U.S. cities will occur, resulting in mass killings, possibly
in the millions. He states God has showed him this vision.
World War 3?
you think? If this were
to take place, then the Warning would also have to happen before
--this year. Whether Mr. Robertson talks to God, or is a part of
secret society, he wouldn't have made such a statement unless he was
almost certain it would happen. It waits to be seen.
have hemophilia and my physical suffering and mental anguish is
unreal. I believe because I suffer so much that God also blesses
with things that he doesn't allow happen to other people. It
see everything so clearly, yet I myself cannot believe things will
pass. I know everything about Maitreya, yet no one around me
he is. I have been shown dreams so real and the Virgin Mary even
appeared to me once and "flashes of lightning" in the room in which I
pray other times.
believe the Miracle will happen on Holy Thursday, March 20, 2008.
Paul II with his institution of the Luminous Mysteries (for Thursdays)
in 2002 prepares us for this event.
I'm not a
date-setter, but for some reason this jumps out to
me. God bless you my brother, my sister.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and concerns with us. Your ailment
is very spiritually close to us since God
misuse of this
same ailment, suffered by the last Tsarevich Alexei
Nikolaevich, to unleash godless communism in the world through the less
than holy activities of Rasputin - rightfully considered one of the
precursors of the False Christ.
You may want to review our posts of today (May 13th) in the Board of
Updates as well as in Public Forum
- Part II
as well as the key links
from said postings.
May God continue to Bless and sustain you!
From VR @
Dubai and India
on May 10th (and enhanced 12 hours later)
Regarding the news report (1)
:Anglican head Williams says anti-gays misread Bible, and I quote:
The spiritual leader of the world's 77 million Anglicans has said conservative Christians who cite the Bible to condemn homosexuality are misreading a key passage written by Saint Paul almost 2,000 years ago.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, addressing theology students in Toronto, said an oft-quoted passage in Paul's Epistle to the Romans meant to warn Christians not to be self-righteous when they see others fall into sin.
In the passage of Romans that Williams referred to in Monday's speech, Paul said people who forgot God's words fell into sin. "Men committed indecent acts with other men and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion," Paul wrote.
How easily he
forgets the guidelines the same Saint Paul gave for men
who were to be bishops and deacons in another one of his letters.
Williams said these lines were "for the majority of modern readers the most important single text in Scripture on the subject of homosexuality." But right after that passage, Paul warns readers not to condemn those who ignore God's word.
The passages in question are:
For this cause God delivered
them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the
natural use into that use which is against nature.
27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of
the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men
working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the
recompense which was due to their error.
28 And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God
delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are
29 Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication,
avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit,
30 Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty,
inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Foolish,
dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. [Romans 1]
Wherefore thou art
inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that
judgest. For wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself. For
thou dost the same things which thou judgest.
2 For we know that the judgment of God is, according to truth,
against them that do such things.
3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them who do such
things, and dost the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness, and patience,
and long suffering? Knowest thou not, that the benignity of God leadeth
thee to penance?
5 But according to thy hardness and impenitent heart, thou
treasurest up to thyself wrath, against the day of wrath, and
revelation of the just judgment of God. [Romans 2]
is quite fascinating how everyone
twists what may be found in the Sacred Scriptures to suit their fancy
or direct others attention from one's less than holy activities.
First of all, we were not even aware of this particular verse when we
wrote our document on homosexuality
(2), however, it was not necessary even
though it is complementary to the points we made. The point Williams is
making we make too - without meaning that we endorse sodomy in any of
its forms (3) nor William's
Somehow the self righteous focus on the evils of sodomy while glossing over the
rest of the litany of transgressions made by Paul such as: "Iniquity,
avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit,
malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud,
haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish,
dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy."
How convenient, point a flashing neon sign towards the sodomites and in
the confusion those who are manning the flashing sign can continue to
practice iniquity (that is "injustice"), malice, fornication (illegal
intercourse with the opposite sex), envious...... proud, haughty,
foolish, dissolute, without mercy.... etc., etc. in peace.
Clever, isn't it? The funniest part - for those who may like dark humor
- is that the the flashing neon sign holding self righteous are
precisely the ones who more often than others insist that "a sin
is a sin" - something that we have debunked elsewhere. Therefore, the
self righteous logic equates sodomy with proud, deceit, and
disobedience to parents, amongst others.
Lord have Mercy! did we write "...disobedience to parents..."?
46 And it came to
pass, that, after
three days, they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the
doctors, hearing them, and asking them questions.
47 And all that heard him were astonished at his wisdom and his
48 And seeing him, they wondered. And his mother said to him:
Son, why hast thou done so to us? behold thy father and I have sought
49 And he said to them: How is it that you sought me? did you not know,
that I must be about my father's business?
50 And they understood not the word that he spoke unto them.
And he went down with them, and came to
Nazareth, and was subject to them. And his mother kept all these words
in her heart.
"Subject to them" in some of the 3,000 Biblical translations is
translated as "Obedient to them"
Of course, Jesus was not being disobedient (more about that on the next
post) to His parents and it is precisely to avoid such Faith destroying
conclusions that God Willed that we publish two documents (4) precisely about the dangers of
literalizing the Sacred Scriptures where they should not.
As another example: Did you notice in one of the quotes above the
statement: For this cause God
them up to shameful affections. ?
If that is taken literally - without theological depth - one will
understand that God caused
them "to such shameful affections". First of all God will not, under
any circumstance, deliver/cause any of His children into such soul
destroying behavior; secondly, the "shameful affection" Paul spoke of
is sodomy . Whether Paul knew
then what God has revealed to us now (3)
or not about this situation, we do not know.
and the Sacred
(3) satan's Coup d'Etat
(4) About Biblical Literalism
- Part I and
From K @
on May 8th
parish does not have a Saturday Mass, I go to another church which is
also in a neighboring diocese and I recently noticed that one of the
priests there does not have the communal chalice before him when he
does the Eucharist blessing and invocations. His chalice is
there (he consumes all this chalice), but the other one he keeps off to
the side but still on the alter table. I see that he hardly
extends his hands much at all over the offerings.
Since they always have two Eucharistic ministers assist, the priests
usually take hosts from the tabernacle for the minister to
distribute, regardless of how many people are at the Mass--it's usually
not very crowded, maybe 35-40 people. Now today,
there were a large number of people at the Mass due to a first
communion retreat. He did his usual with the chalice. Then
he took the hosts from the tabernacle and began placing some of those
onto the container he used for the consecration (from which he will
distribute communion). As he was doing this, he picked up and
consumed another communion from his container. I thought it
was unusual for him to do this, since he had already served himself
communion. Then when I approached to receive communion, there
were not all that many hosts in his container, which made me wonder if
he had consecrated any hosts there at all, besides the celebrant's host.
the Mass, I ran into a woman who belongs to this parish who I had met
there a few months ago and whose son is a newly ordained priest and
shared my concerns with her. She said that she had always
heard that anything on the table during the consecration would
then be consecrated, so when her son performed a Mass at her home, he
left the container for the wine on the small table they were using as
an altar, and she was worried that this wine was also
consecrated. But her son told her--not so--it is only whatever
the priest's intends at the time of the consecration that
then become the Body and Blood. So she explains to me that as
long as the priest today intends to also consecrate everything
on the table, then it is done, no matter where the items are placed in
relation to his extended hands.
came home and read your article--again--on transubstantiation....and
that does not seem to be the case from what you say. I take your
word for it, since I know your source is the First-Hand. Now my
question, besides that I think I should find a different Saturday Mass
church, do you think it would be helpful for me to write an e-mail to
this priest and question what I observed and send him a copy of
your article (I am not a parishioner)? and my nice lady-friend and
her son? I believe her when she says this is the instruction her
son received. I would guess he probably believes what he was
taught about intention
Your concern is very valid and quite Universal.
God pointed out to miguel the grave irregularities in the consecration
of the wine and bread as far
back as 1992. You can imagine how much worse it is fifteen years
later; fifteen years which have seen the
canonization of a man like
Escriva, a man like
Levada being appointed "Guardian of the Faith"
(Faith in whom? satan?) and efforts to restore Judas to Grace to the
detriment of the entire
New Testament - all the while Ratzinger
wears his Prada shoes and the
masses blissfully adore him.
The "intention concept" which that poor newly ordained priest
was taught is wrong. Will they ordain a priest without hands? Offer the
Sacrament of Reconciliation and Absolution via the Internet? How
about Vatican Bishops ordaining Vatican subservient priests in the PRC
through a remote, yet "well intentioned", ceremony? Well, considering
all the factors, they may just do that any day now and the blind sheep
will fall for it.
What we have stated in our document about Transubstantiation
is the way
it is - ot at least the best way that it can be explain for humans to
The "bait and switch" technique you describe in your letter (getting
out of the Tabernacle hosts which "always were consecrated in another
Mass" - we are still looking for those elusive Masses... (1) ) it is so
commonplace that is no longer questioned by the disoriented Faithful.
Should you change your Saturday Mass Church? By all means! We are
quite confident that most hosts being consumed today in many parts of
the world are not
consecrated. Therefore, when the Faithful finds a priest of God -
just latch on to the Sacraments he dispenses and accept no substitutes.
Back to the newly ordained priest. In the late eighties there were many
Seminarians in the Houston-Galveston Area who referred to us - those
who Adored the Blessed Sacrament - as "Cookie worshippers." That was in
the late eighties! Am afraid to ask what, in their opinion, we should
be called today - nearly twenty years later.
Divine Mercy demands that you share with both priests
the information which we have published in the Name of God so that they
have an opportunity to correct their errors - although, in
all probability, it will be rejected.
(1) Only have
observed this occur in the Sanctuary of Fatima when, at times, there
may be fifty or a hundred priests concelebrating a Mass with an Altar
packed with chalices full of hosts. Logically, even though there
may be thousands in attendance, hundreds of consecrated hosts remain
after Mass which, in procession, are ceremoniously place in the
Tabernacle of the Sanctuary.
From ZM @
on May 6th
I read a lot of news, both international, technical and Ukraine/Eastern
Europe/Russia and local. Like in all the world things most of
news are bad.
I'm wondering if I need to re-tell those news to my
friends, and family. From one side I know that probably they do not
understand full scale of events and even when they do this information
is a heavy burden for them and probably with such information their
life is not getting easier.
But from the other side it is told that "we are the salt to the world"
and if we do not tell this who will?
question is - maybe I'm wrong with what I do - probably they need first
to know more about Real Christ and Christianity and only later about
realities of this world?
In other words probably "evangelization"
mission has higher priority than "announcement of impending
If it is possible, thank you for yours answer.
May God help you in your work,
Thank you for this opportunity to discuss this matter.
The question that you bring up is very important for the solution must
be perfectly balanced to yield the desired results.
First of all, we must live our Faith with serenity and conviction - no
fanaticism but no compromise. Always keeping in mind the words of Jesus:
the scribes and the Pharisees, seeing that he ate with
publicans and sinners, said to his disciples: Why doth your master eat
and drink with publicans and sinners? Jesus hearing
this, saith to them:
They that are well have no need of a physician, but they that are sick.
For I came not to call the just, but sinners. [Mark 2: 16-18]
miguel de Portugal "worked" the
discotheques (1985 through 1991) no one knew who he was nor what he did
there yet he was always accepted as "part of the scene" without him taking part of
the scene. Many crucifixes and medals were given in those places
- on command from God - which were received with such reverence -
even by the most "hardened" sinners - that it was truly humbling. He
could write a book with the most incredible stories of that phase of
his work for God. No one ever showed lack of respect and he found more
saints and witnessed
more conversions in those discotheques and alley
ways than he ever did in the Church pews.
Living our Faith
with serenity and conviction is the most powerful
Evangelization tool. This process starts opening the Eyes and Earsof
those who must eventually See and Hear.
Secondly, the news of the days can be commented upon in a matter of
fact manner, always drawing parallels to proven concrete facts like
conspiracies, mass brainwashing activities by
the media, the
concerted effort to destroy
the foundations of the Christian Faith, the
dangers of fanaticism,
due to child sex abuse, etc.
These are seeds which are casually dropped along the way, at the
appropriate time, will eventually cause the individual to think
on his/her own: "Didn't Z mention something like this?"
Last, but not least, and in accordance to the latest instructions from
Heaven - shift the focus from the Second Coming of Jesus to the
manifestation of the False Christ. It is very hard for people
conceive the Second Coming of Christ and it "cannot be proven"
has happened in a Flash; however, the preparations for the
manifestation of the False Christ are easily discernible - whether
through the easily proven fact of the plans for the One
Government as well as the One
If we can succeed in achieving the opening of the Eyes and Ears of the
Elect who are still in a slumber and alert them to the advent of the
False Christ, who could even deceive the Elect [Matthew 24:24], success
will be complete because when Jesus manifests Himself in His Second
Coming (Step No. 14 of the Sequence
of Events), the event will be
joyfully accepted - even if it was not consciously expected.
on May 4th
My sister, age 53 has terminal
cancer. I feel blocked when I want to ask an Intention for
her, so I realized I needed to examine my relationship with
Her life has been lived in opposition to my own, from childhood,
desiring all that the world and New-Age self worship can offer.
Many times she has intentionally offended me. Perhaps
she didn't mean to hurt ME but opposed my Spirit; however, the
hurt and offenses are there and continue even now that she is
Thus I feel a block to my desire to pray for her salvation.
Have you any advice and a prayer to help me?
Only God can remove that block from your heart; a block which appears
to have been "well cemented" by her continued antagonism throughout a
First step is to imagine, in the quiet of your soul, that she
apologizes to you and is desirous to make amends. What do you feel? If
the forgiveness comes naturally - as if it had been there all the time
just waiting for her to release it with a sincere apology, you have
reached the perfection of the Father (be Perfect as your Father is
perfect) in this most important area.
If you do not feel that way, then that may be the source of the block
you experience in praying for her conversion.
If you feel that way, then, the spiritual scars which resulted from her
unrelenting attacks are hindering you. In either case the solution is
to ask God to bestow upon you the necessary Graces to overcome either
Let us not forget the covenant we enter with God whenever we pray the
Our Father. Most
individuals take that as "just another prayer",
yet, it is not. It is a covenant which God will uphold, thus, He
will "...forgive our trespasses (just) as we forgive those who trespass
From The M+G+R
Foundation - Published
on April 27th
Since we continue to lack the physical support necessary to function in an appropriate manner and fulfill our God given Charter, we are cutting back in the areas that we are able to do so. Attending correspondence is one of those areas.
Any correspondence addressed to us will be looked at eventually, although an individual response will no longer be possible except in very rare occasions.
We invoke upon you many Blessings from on High!
The M+G+R Foundation
From LP @
on April 30th
Bartholomew I, the Ecumenical Patriarch of the Orthodox Church
(Catholic Church of the East), has endorsed Benedict XVI's book on
Well, as we said, God secured a delay through
some behind the
work but, it was only a delay and Bartholomew I finally caved in to
enticements of the Vatican. All is working out according to schedule.
Forum - April 2007 - Edition Files
Copyright 2007 by
Foundation. All rights reserved.
BOARD Listing the Latest Updates
to this Domain
PAGE - English
PAGE - Español
PAGE - Portugues
If the above dated
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view
If you wish to contact The M+G+R
please Click Here and
You may freely reproduce and
this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its
(2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and
(3) No charge is made for it.